My name is Louise. I live in Wisconsin and I have blasto. I would like to tell my story and see if anyone can answer an important question.
I thought I had a cold (bad one...after 4-5 weeks went to clinic). They did a chest xray and found an "area of concern". Next step was a CT scan. After that, the clinic called and said they wanted me to see a pulmonologist. We have only one here in our relatively small city. The same day, they called back and said they wanted me to see a Thoracic surgeon (again, we have only one). The nurse on the phone said that they would do a bronchoscopy. My understanding of this was that it was a method to get a biopsy.
I went to the surgeon, and he told me that I had a large tumor and that it needed to come out, and soon. He said there was 50% chance on malignancy. Said he would go in, take a piece out, check it, and then remove it if it was NOT malignant, and remove the whole lobe if it WAs malignant.
Woke up from surgery and found they had taken the lobe, but they did not biopsy. He said that it was because it was larger that he thought and ir was higher up...near where the 2 lobes meet. He told me he was 95% sure it was primary lung cancer. 3 days later he came in and said it was Cryptocococcus Neoformans, which is also a fungal infection. Put me on a drug for that. 2 weeks after surgery I was told that it was Blasto. I got ahold of the original pathology report and discovered that it said blasto all along. I did not start on antifungal treatment for this until almons 1 month after surgery.
Now, my question is......did I lose my lobe unnecessarily? Couldn't he have done some sort of biopsy to discover this, instead of being so sure that it was cancer? He was not familiar with blasto, I'm sure. I feel this may be a case of medical malpractice.
Can you tell me whatever you know about this?
Grateful!
